iHuman Case Study Evita Alonso, 48yrs Old Female Hispanic
American Female CC: Abdominal Pain 3 DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF
THE ANSWER EXPERT FEEDBACK
... [Show More] (SOLUTIONS) NRNP 6531 WEEK
7 iHuman WALDEN UNIVERSITY
]
Reflective Thinking Exercises (start a new page)
1. History-Taking: Describe your history taking scores and strengths you identified when gathering data. What went
well? Also, describe your challenges in gathering data and list areas of your personal needed improvement. Note any
missed areas that could be safety issues/errors leading to missed or incorrect diagnosis.
I have seen good improvement with history taking, but I still cannot get all the required interview questions on the first
attempt. My history taking scores are still low the first attempt was 73% with an improvement with the second attempt of
100%. The Dain textbook was a great resource in focusing my interview questions
2. Physical Exam: Describe your physical exam scores and strengths you identified when performing selected exams on
your patient. Did you perform an excessive amount of exam items? Did you miss any pertinent exam items identified in
the case leading to diagnosis? Note any missed areas that could be safety issues/errors leading to missed or incorrect
diagnosis.
Physical exam scores are 88% for the first attempt and 100% for the second attempt. I see great improvement in this section.
This is the area that I have seen the most growth since the beginning of the semester. I still need to get my auscultation skills
perfected as I still get feedback that I missed something in the sequence
3. Evidence-based decision making: Discuss the evidence-based resource(s) utilized while seeing the patient. These can be
your course readings/IHUMAN lessons/other course info as well as any external articles or supporting literature to
help you gain a better understanding of categorizing possible diagnoses in your case. How did you use the
symptoms/patient presentation, plus your exam findings, to formulate a differential diagnosis list? What specific
feedback from previous case studies has your faculty identified that you plan to incorporate on future cases to avoid
pitfalls in data gathering or decision making? What will you do differently to improve?
The required text readings from S2D and Dain was very beneficial especially S2D with identifying differential diagnosis. As I
get more familiar with the course material, I do not agree with all the expert feedback on the differential diagnosis. Some of
the diagnosis that I chose fit the symptoms of the patient and were still not listed in the expert list.
NRNP 6531 WEEK_7 inhuman Case Study Evita Alonso -
48-year-old Hispanic female CC: Abdominal pain
COMPLETE 2 DIFFERENT EXPERT FEEDBACK
(ANSWERS) 2023 UPDATE
CONTENTS: ALL QUESTIONS, OLD-CARTS for the HPI, (PMH, FH, SH as
Needed), PHSICAL EXAM, EXAMS FEEDBACK, CASE
FINDINGS, FEEDBACK, DIFFERENTIAL RANKING, DIAGNOSIS, CASE PLAN
VERSION A
CC: abdominal pain
HP [Show Less]