Note - Canada is a G8 country and very economically powerful. Our top 5 exports all
rely on oil and gas (our top 5 exports are crude oil, refined oil,
... [Show More] gas, refined gas and car
parts for oil-and-gas using cars). How can we move toward green-cars when we are
rich because of oil and gas? Would you really be willing to economically crush the
country to go green? Do you believe Canada can out-compete the Japanese, US and
China in green technology? Canada only produces 2% of the world's greenhouse gas
emissions. Also of note - Canada signed the Paris Agreement agreeing to cut our
emissions. But to meet the goals we promised to reach by 2030, we'd have to
completely eliminate our entire oil and gas industry, our entire electrical industry, 1/2 our
agricultural industry, and our entire transportation industry. Do you think it was ethical
for our PM to agree to these goals in 2030 knowing perfectly well that we would never
come close to reaching them?
The Paris Climate Agreement Change is a “good deal.” Good is a very vague word so it is
possible to be both good and bad. It depends how we define the word good. I believe the deal is
good in respect to the fact that so many countries coming together to set goals and action plans to
reach those goals is a step in the right direction. Harf, Harf and Lombard quote the Greenpeace
Executive Director Jennifer Morgan as saying, “Although it is true that the current commitments
of the Paris signatories fall far short of the emissions cuts required to meet the aspirational 1.5 –
degree target…the solution is not in giving up the goal but in significantly stepping up action
while also investing in adaptation to build resilience” (page 90). So, the deal is bad in the way
that its goals are not enough according to some scientists. Furthermore, there does not exist any
checks or controls to make sure the goals are met. Countries are free to act upon their promise [Show Less]