Homepage - MGT516 Legal Implications in Human Resources Management (FEB2016FT-1)
For our very dynamic and timely SLP scenario, review the attached and r... [Show More] ead the following:Jack and Eric are both hourly employees in the finishing department. They work under Phil, the first-shift finishing foreman. Steve is the second-shift foreman.Jack has been complaining that Eric is trying to get him to quit so that Eric's friend can be employed in Jack's job. He says Eric has bullied and harassed him. Jack thinks it is because he helped in union organizing activities last year (Eric is anti-union).Jack says that Eric complains about anything that he does and constantly badgers him to quit. Jack alleges that Eric deliberately does not pass on crucial information about day-to-day work, which then creates the impression that Jack is underperforming in his role.Jack has raised concerns about this treatment from Eric on many occasions with Phil, his foreman, who has simply told him to deal with the matter himself.Jack says he is stressed out and alleges that things came to a head when Eric spent a whole day picking on him and he (Jack) openly cried. Eric repeatedly told Jack that he was not wanted on the finishing team and should quit.Jack couldn’t afford to be without a job and did not see why he should be forced out. He went home and decided that he was too upset to go to work the following day. He called in that night and told the next shift's foreman, Steve, that he was too stressed to go to work the next day because he would be picked on.Steve said he was aware of what had been alleged and thought it had been dealt with by Phil months ago. He advised Jack that he should not go to work the next day and that he (Steve) would speak to Phil.Jack did as he was instructed, and missed the next day of work. When he returned the following day, Phil called him into the office to ask why he had not been at work and why he had not called in to speak to him directly to report his absence.Jack was told that because he did not comply with the call-in policy he would get a “ding” on his attendance record. He explained that he called and talked to Steve who was aware of what had happened and had advised him not to go into work the next day.Phil laughed and told Jack that the department had had bets on whether he would be at work the day after he had been crying and that because of his failure to attend, Phil and Steve had each won $50.Jack told Phil that he was going to file a grievance with the union because he thought the way he was being treated was not right.Phil told Jack that if he filed a grievance he would be fired for insubordination. Instead, he should just knuckle down and do his work.Phil thinks that Jack is the problem, not anyone else.Jack is very upset and decides that enough is enough. He files a formal grievance with the union about this situation.
Questions:1. What do you think will happen next without any intervention? Why?2. Discuss the important steps that might take place to resolve this issue.
3. If you were the HR manager in this plant, describe in detail what would you do to get to the root of the issue. Why?Bring in at least 2 TUI library sources plus any applicable background readings to help strengthen your discussion. The paper should be 2-3 pages, not counting cover and reference pages
SLP Assignment Expectations
Apply HRM terminology, HRM background reading, research, and business examples of HRM policies, practices, and procedures. Bring in other private sector employers' HRM activities, systems, practices, and procedures as examples that fit into your assignment discussion. Include the employers’ names. [Show Less]